Hi, Noodlebean.
Â
Three things bouncing around my noggin this week:
Â
- An on-point question from a reader about whether content is "working" if it's not delivering obvious leads—and how to manage that tension with that one sales guy.
 - The unexpected creative lesson Conan
O'Brien gave me. We aren't actually friends, but I like to think we might be.
 - And finally: True crime.
Â
(P.S. And an update on Dot.)
Â
* * *
Â
I run our LinkedIn newsletter of roughly 3K readers for a financial technology
company. Our Sales Manager worries it's not pulling in enough leads, especially enterprise ones, and wants to ditch it in favor of bottom-funnel content. I see value in building long-term trust and our own list through the newsletter. I could use your perspective: What should I focus on if I want a newsletter to resonate with the right audience? —Kate
Â
The tension you're describing isn't really
about the newsletter. It's about two wildly different definitions of what's "working" in your marketing.
Â
The Sales Manager is measuring with leads as the metric.
Â
You're measuring with trust as the metric.
Â
Neither of you is wrong. But you're not having the same conversation. It's
the old blind-men-and-the-elephant problem: One of you has hold of the trunk, the other the tail, another an ear... and so on. Each is adamant they've got the whole story.
Â
A few thoughts for you and the Sales Manager, who in my head I've now named Steve. (For no reason other than he seems like a Steve.)
Â
Start with the newsletter's actual job.
A newsletter is like a border collie: It needs a job or it's just racing around your strategy deck, barking at random metrics.
Â
Its job is not to say, "We cover fintech." Its job is to help one specific reader think through a specific kind of problem.
Â
So in financial services technology, step away from the broad topic bucket:
Â
NOT THIS: payments, platforms, the magic and wonders of fintech
Â
YES THIS: feelings—meaning the anxiety, decision, or ambition your reader carries into work on a regular Tuesday
Â
Maybe that's:
- What keeps them up
the night before a board meeting
- What decision they're worried about getting wrong
- What pressure lands on their shoulders every quarter
Â
Step into their shoes. Slip on their skin. Feel what they feel. (You toss the border collie a biscuit. He spins with joy.)
Â
The goal is that tiny electric moment when a reader pumps their
fist in the air and screams inside their head: YES. This is exactly how it feels for me.
Â
And the more precisely you write to someone, the more the wrong someones opt out. Godspeed, Wrong-someones. Self-selection is good in B2B Marketing.
Â
(Quick aside on unsubscribes, because marketers can
get weirdly tender about them—and I used to, too: Let them leave. It's better they leave than linger on your list like zombies—dead-eyed, shambling around, clicking nothing, wanting nothing. Not everyone is your person. That's perfectly fine.)
Â
Back to Steve.
Â
Steve wants enterprise buyers. Fair enough, Steve.
Â
But here's the secret about the magical and elusive unicorn called the enterprise buyer: They rarely convert cold from bottom-funnel content.
Â
They research slowly. They trust slowly. They buy slowly. A newsletter that builds familiarity over six months is doing work that a cold demo offer simply won't get the chance to do.
Â
So what's missing here isn't the newsletter. It's the explicit connection between what the newsletter builds—trust, familiarity, credibility—and what the business eventually wants: pipeline.
Â
Which means that if you want the newsletter to pull real strategic weight as it herds prospects like a border collie all over the internet... you need two things:
Â
- A clearer editorial
through-line—a point of view readers come to associate with your brand
 - A better picture of who is reading—not just how many
Â
Because 3,000 readers who are CFOs at mid-market companies is an entirely different asset than 30,000 random LinkedIn subscribers.
Â
The newsletter isn't the problem.
Â
You and Steve both need the patience to let that connection materialize.
Â
Related: Should You Publish a LinkedIn Newsletter or a Traditional Newsletter? Or both?
Â
MORE THIS WEEK
Insights From Conan. We're all told to write for the audience. But what if that's only half the
story?
Â
I've been thinking about that ever since a Conan O'Brien joke at the Oscars—and it leads to somewhere interesting about AI and first drafts.
Â
True crime: Did you get this email? Someone is pretending to be me, but getting it all wrong. The biggest tell: the sign-off... and ZERO em dashes?!